WWE is facing fresh legal trouble stemming from its high-profile Premium Live Events deal with ESPN, as a new class action lawsuit was officially filed on January 8, 2026. The lawsuit accuses WWE of deceptive marketing practices tied to how access to PLEs was communicated following the 2025 announcement that WWE events would move to ESPN’s direct-to-consumer streaming platform.

The news was first reported by Brandon Thurston of POST Wrestling, who outlined the core allegations and potential fallout. At the heart of the case is the claim that many fans were led to believe they would automatically receive access to WWE Premium Live Events if they already subscribed to ESPN through cable, satellite, or live TV streaming services — only to later discover they had to pay an additional monthly fee.

What the Lawsuit Is Claiming

According to the filing, customers who already had ESPN through providers like Xfinity or YouTube TV still had to sign up and pay for ESPN DTC in order to watch WWE’s Premium Live Events. The plaintiffs argue this directly contradicts how the deal was publicly described by both WWE and ESPN.

The lawsuit estimates that more than $5 million is tied up in disputed subscription fees. If successful, eligible customers could receive refunds or partial reimbursements. Those represented in the case are ESPN customers who already had access through a TV provider but signed up for ESPN DTC in the lead-up to Wrestlepalooza on September 20, 2025.

Notably, WWE is the only defendant named in the suit. ESPN and its parent company, Disney, were intentionally left out. This move reportedly helps avoid arbitration clauses and class action waivers found in Disney’s terms of service, which also apply to platforms like Disney+.

As of now, neither WWE nor ESPN has issued an official response, though statements are expected as the case develops.

How It All Started

The complaint was filed by Michael Diesa of New Jersey and Rebecca Toback of New York, both of whom say they were misled into paying for access they believed was already included. Toback subscribes to YouTube TV, while Diesa has an Xfinity cable package — both of which already provide ESPN access.

The lawsuit references WWE President Nick Khan’s appearance on the Varsity podcast, where he compared the ESPN deal to WWE’s previous Peacock agreement and suggested there would be no additional charge for existing subscribers. WWE and ESPN’s joint press release announcing the deal is also cited, as it stated ESPN DTC features would be available to anyone already subscribed to ESPN, either directly or through a TV provider.

However, the situation wasn’t uniform across all providers. Customers using DirecTV, Verizon FIOS, and Spectrum reportedly did receive access to WWE events at no extra cost due to separate agreements with Disney. That inconsistency is a major reason why only certain subscribers qualify for the class action.

Why the Case Matters

The plaintiffs acknowledge that individual payouts may only be around $30 or slightly more if they win. Still, the bigger issue is scale. Estimates suggest between 95,000 and 125,000 users signed up for ESPN DTC around Wrestlepalooza, potentially generating millions in additional revenue. That’s on top of WWE’s reported average of $325 million per year from its ESPN deal.

Whether the lawsuit succeeds or not, it shines a spotlight on how major media rights deals are marketed to fans — especially as streaming, cable, and hybrid subscription models continue to overlap. For WWE, it’s another off-screen storyline to manage as scrutiny around its business practices remains as intense as ever.